Phd thesis on corporate social responsibility in india
and has been given an equally prestigious scholarship. To venture a hypothesis (which it exceeds the scope of this paper to fully substantiate I would suggest that the idea that it is useful to appeal to the corporation as a moral entity has arisen (at least partially) on the basis of our loss. Because the field of CSR is wide, my goal in this article will not be to pay special attention to any particular theorists work rather, I shall try and focus on the general principles that must be at stake in putting forward CSR. Aguilera, Rupp, Williams, and Ganapathi (2007 Castelo Branco and Rodrigues (2006 Coutinho and Macedo-Soares (2002 Husted and Allen (2000, 2001 McWilliams and Siegel (2001 Porter and Kramer (2002, 2006 Pearce and Doh (2005 Husted and Salazar (2005, 2006 the efforts of these authors do not. Others talk in more pragmatic terms of just finishing in order to put the experience behind them. As Henry Mintzberg puts it, Social responsibility that most nave of concepts represents our best hope, perhaps our only real hope (2007: 50).
Retrieved June 26, 2009, from Links Castelo.,., Rodrigues,. People who cannot, or will not, buy in to the resilience narrative seem to show signs of being alienated, sometimes extremely. (This might be a matter of showing that executives have special, extra duties duties that they have over and above their duties as human beings or it may simply be to show that moral duties in some way trump any occupational duties.) These two approaches. Richard Marens (2013) has argued (rather persuasively) that CSR as a discourse about corporate management has arisen and taken hold in the wake of the loss of explicit, legal forms of business regulation. It is at this point that we should return to corporate management and agency theory.